This movie has created a great deal of hype concerning it's extraordinarily violent content and cut up porn scenes. The writer/director would have you believe that this matierial is groundbreaking stuff, but it isn't. Nothing in this ever goes beyond exploitation. If you watch this movie and 'I Spit on Your Grave' then you will find this one even more ludicrous. The motives for the main characters actions aren't even close to the girl in the other movie even though the two feel similar. Some have compared this to Thelma and Louise, the truth is that Thelma and Louis didn't use its material to exploit the evils of society and this one does. It does it like most exploitational films so it as well, in an amateurish fashion with little to no sophisticated camera work and really bad dialogue because the emphasis is on realism, not dramaticism, right? A story like this could happen, but does that mean it would make a good film? Also, at a running time of 77 minutes how can this film feel any way except half baked. To me this film only had the message that woman have the power to kill man and have sex with a man whenever they want, and in whatever order that they desire. I knew that, but did a film have to be made in order to emphasis this evil. By the way, I don't mean to imply that males doing the same thing are any less evil, I'd feel the same way if the sex of the lead characters were changes, it was just that bad.